On 26 October, the UN General Assembly’s First Committee (which deals with disarmament and national security) passed a draft resolution requesting the Secretary-General to look into the possibility of creating a comprehensive, legally binding international instrument to control the import, export and transfer of conventional arms.
Co-sponsored by 116 states, the resolution received overwhelming support. Of the 164 states that voted (the delegates of a number of smaller states were absent), 139 were in favour, including Britain and the whole of Europe; 24 abstained, including China, Cuba, India, Iran, Israel, Pakistan, Russia and Somalia; and only one voted against –
the United States.
It appears that most of the world would like to control the trade in conventional arms – the assault rifles in the hands of the boy soldiers of the Lord’s Resistance Army in Uganda and the warring militias of Chechnya, Somalia, Sri Lanka, Sudan and Tonga......
The voting patterns over the last 12 months are revealing. On a resolution on the illicit trade in small arms, 172 countries were in favour, with no abstentions and
only the US against. On a resolution towards the elimination of nuclear weapons, 168 were in favour, there were eight abstentions, and four against: Equatorial Guinea, India, North Korea
and the US. On a draft resolution on the Comprehensive Nuclear Test-Ban Treaty, 175 countries were in favour, there were four abstentions, and two against:
North Korea and the US.
Is it naive to ask why the richest and
most ‘Christian’ country in the world should go out on a limb and set itself against all that seems right and honourable and Christian in this way? Is it too simplistic to wonder why
the US is willing to vote against everyone else
and align itself with North Korea?
Not that we can, with integrity, express self-righteous indignation at the voting patterns of
our partner in the ‘war on terror’. Even now, the British government is using all its diplomatic skills to back the US in blocking a ban on cluster bombs.